![]() In Web3, individuals own their social media posts and can easily move between platforms. Viable Twitter alternatives.ĭecentralized social media platforms celebrate and honor self-sovereign identity. This is more than a vision for the future. Users should own their data, control it, and be rewarded for it. In any place there’s centralized ownership, users lose out. A shifting of the power disparity, where people are abandoning these platforms in search of a different way of connecting, communicating, and cultivating relationships online. In other words, no Musk, or the likes thereof!īut this is about more than Twitter. There is no one server, company or person running it or making money off it. In parallel, the decentralized Twitter-alternative, Mastodon, gained nearly 30,000 new users on the day of the acquisition. The huge fluctuations in user follower counts also indicate a material shift in sentiment on what will and won’t be okay on the new Twitter. In light of the buy-out, hundreds of thousands of Twitter users deactivated their accounts. Especially with a powerful billionaire owning it, under the guise of ‘protecting democracy’. Centralized ownership contradicts Web3 ideals. The reality is, Twitter can’t truly be trusted. Twitter also doesn’t share the value it captures via ad revenue with the users on the platform who create that value, which we believe is fundamentally wrong.” “We should be looking for Twitter alternatives because Twitter’s data monopoly gives a handful of tech executives in Silicon Valley exorbitant control over the public discourse and increases the barrier to entry for creating new social media products. We asked gm.xyz co-founder Michael McGuiness on his thoughts on alternatives to Twitter, he said: The relative “freedom” of Twitter against censorship during the Arab Spring was pivotal to this movement. People are starting to see this, particularly Twitter users. The rich get exponentially richer and society splinters.ĭecentralized systems rebalance control back towards the individual. In centralized systems, anyone can simply force his or her will on the world, by throwing enough money at it. ![]() When we live under the arbitrary power of a few, we’re not free. Billionaires buying up media platforms is nothing new. Motives aside, the fact Musk was able to wake up one day and buy Twitter is an issue in itself. He’s got a track record of being petty and unpredictable. Musk also previously used his power to cancel a blogger’s Tesla order, after a negative letter went viral. He could ban anyone, like a teenager who tracks Musk’s private jet. Why is this an issue?įor a myriad of reasons. It impacts public discourse, well beyond the 280-character limit. ![]() These changes will affect more than just Twitter. The most interesting of his plans is to “authenticate all real humans.” Musk plans to take Twitter private, with the vision of an ‘open source’ algorithm, an ‘inclusive arena for free expression.’ And in doing so, will make sweeping (subjective) changes to the content moderation policy and the business model. On April 25, 2022, the board of directors approved his offer. He first purchased a 9.2% stake in the giant social media platform, followed by a bid to buy Twitter. In a US$44 billion deal last week, Musk bought Twitter. And most alarmingly, the illusion, the paradox of ‘free speech’, is not possible in Web2. The immeasurable, unregulated power one man has. Be creative and not lazy - one or more of those innovative concepts can and will make your site prosper.Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, just bought Twitter. By doing this, you extend your site out even further through various media / content channels. My last bit of insight is that you should think of different ways to use your site as content within other content types. I have recently started on twitch and I don't even play any games - but I have a new product in this niche and so the show must and has gone on! But if you're in the gaming niche and you are not doing twitch, then you're not in the gaming niche. Web 2.0 sites include:, Facebook and other social media, and others. Think about where and how your site can extend it's utility to other web assets that enjoy much more traffic than your site has. I would use existing Web 2.0 platforms to extend the "service" of a website. Later on, you may want to trim your traffic channels and strengthen consistent flow. Same answer I gave in your other thread: any idea is good to get started if you feel good about it as a traffic pulling resource.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |